What is Corporate Linkage?

  • Ownership & corporate structure
  • Corporate group relationships
  • 3 min read

The short answer

Corporate linkage describes the relationships between legal entities, such as parent companies, subsidiaries and other members of a corporate group. It turns individual company records into a view of how businesses are connected. Each relationship should identify its type and the evidence supporting it.

Corporate Linkage: why it matters

A supplier, buyer or acquisition target may form part of a larger group. Understanding that structure can reveal shared exposure, connected customers or additional entities that need review. It also prevents separate records from being interpreted as independent businesses when they are part of a common structure.

How to assess it in practice

Resolve each entity before creating a relationship. Record whether the connection represents ownership, control or another documented association. Capture relevant percentages and dates where available, and retain the source. Distinguish direct parent relationships from the highest parent found in the available evidence. Refresh links when filings or other reliable sources show a change.

Worked example

A procurement team has contracts with three suppliers that have different names. A linkage review finds that all three are subsidiaries of the same parent. The team can now examine its group exposure while retaining each subsidiary as a separate legal counterparty.

Illustrative scenario

Two companies share a website but have no established ownership link. Store the brand association without presenting it as a confirmed corporate group edge.

Distinctions that matter

Corporate linkage maps entity-to-entity relationships. UBO analysis follows relevant ownership and control paths to individuals. Entity resolution determines whether records describe the same entity before either kind of relationship is created.

Evidence and review output

Review these

  • Entity identifiers at both ends
  • Relationship type and source
  • Effective dates and group boundary

The review should produce

A dated set of supported entity relationships, distinct from branding or other inferred associations.

Across this family

Define what makes an entity part of the group before drawing relationships. Legal control, accounting consolidation and commercial affiliation are not identical. Store relationship types and dates so a user can understand why two entities are connected without assuming they share every obligation.

A note from practice

Corporate linkage should state the relationship type and supporting evidence. A common address, brand or director can indicate a connection without proving a parent-subsidiary relationship.

Limits and common mistakes

A common address or website does not establish a parent-subsidiary relationship by itself. Avoid creating ownership links from weak similarities. Historical relationships should not be silently displayed as current, and a group graph should make missing information visible rather than imply that every layer has been found.

Frequently asked questions

Is shared branding proof of ownership?

No. Confirm the relationship using appropriate evidence.

Can linked entities be merged into one record?

No. Group membership does not make separate legal entities identical.

How does linkage support UBO analysis?

It supplies corporate layers that may need to be followed to the relevant individuals.

Continue learning

See the registry record behind every answer.

Primary, government-sourced data on 600M+ companies in 200+ countries, with full source attribution.