What is Identity Verification?

  • Identity & compliance
  • Business identity & verification
  • 4 min read

The short answer

Identity verification checks whether identity evidence supports the identity claimed by a person or entity in a particular workflow.

Identity Verification: why it matters

An onboarding or review decision can contain several different questions. Keeping this concept distinct helps the team assign the right evidence and decision owner, rather than rely on a single completed status.

How to assess it in practice

Keep individual identity checks separate from legal-entity registry checks and record which question each result answers. Start by defining the question the team needs to answer. Identify the relevant record or evidence, check its scope and date, and retain the reasoning behind the result. If evidence conflicts, keep that conflict visible for review.

Worked example

Illustrative workflow: a team reviewing a business adds a separate check for identity verification. The reviewer’s task is to keep individual identity checks separate from legal-entity registry checks and record which question each result answers. The outcome is recorded together with the supporting evidence; an unresolved question stays open rather than being converted into a positive result.

Illustrative scenario

A valid individual identity check accompanies an application for an unrelated business. Review representation separately rather than extending the identity result to the company.

Distinctions that matter

Identity Verification belongs to the business identity & verification topic family. Read Know Your Business (KYB) alongside it to understand the adjacent question. Each page has its own intended scope; shared context does not make the concepts equivalent.

Evidence and review output

Review these

  • Entity and person identifiers
  • Source and document scope
  • Authority and unresolved discrepancies

The review should produce

A subject-level decision with each claim marked supported, contradicted or unresolved, plus the owner of any outstanding review.

Across this family

Start with the subject of each claim: legal entity, individual applicant or authorised actor. Keep identity evidence, representation and relationship approval as separate decisions. This prevents one technically successful lookup from being promoted into a broader conclusion it cannot support.

A note from practice

Identity verification assesses the claimed subject against suitable evidence. A genuine document does not automatically establish that its presenter controls it or is authorised to represent a company.

Limits and common mistakes

The practical boundary is important: Keep individual identity checks separate from legal-entity registry checks and record which question each result answers. Do not substitute a related label for this check or assume that missing information is a negative finding. Source-specific and jurisdiction-specific rules require their own review.

Frequently asked questions

Which evidence should I review?

For this topic, focus on entity and person identifiers, source and document scope, authority and unresolved discrepancies. The relevant source and dates should be retained with the finding.

How is Identity Verification different from Authorised Representative?

An authorised representative is a person permitted to act for a business within a defined scope of authority. The distinction matters because the evidence needed for that concept may not resolve the question addressed on this page.

What should the result of the review contain?

A subject-level decision with each claim marked supported, contradicted or unresolved, plus the owner of any outstanding review. Preserve material conflicts instead of replacing them with an unexplained success flag.

Continue learning

See the registry record behind every answer.

Primary, government-sourced data on 600M+ companies in 200+ countries, with full source attribution.