Global Database vs Moody's Orbis
Moody’s — through its Orbis platform, formerly Bureau van Dijk (BvD) before its 2017 acquisition — is fundamentally a data aggregator: it licenses and blends company data from multiple third-party vendors rather than connecting directly to the source registry. Global Database sources every record directly, publishes the source, link, timestamp, and official filing behind it, and adds an ownership graph connecting 45M+ companies and 500M+ people on top.
Global Database vs Moody's Orbis at a glance
Moody's built its Orbis dataset primarily through the 2017 acquisition of Bureau van Dijk (BvD), and has continued aggregating and licensing datasets from a network of third-party providers since. Global Database sources directly and shows its work.
Why sourcing model matters
An aggregator is only as current and traceable as its weakest upstream vendor. Direct sourcing means every fact can be traced back to where it came from.
Every Global Database record carries its source, a link to it, a timestamp, and — where applicable — the official filing it was drawn from. That's a structurally different guarantee than a licensed, blended feed: it means a compliance or credit decision can point back to a primary document, not a vendor's aggregation of one.
What's the difference between Global Database and Moody's Orbis?
Moody’s Orbis — the company-data product most people mean when they compare "Moody’s" for company and ownership information — began life as Bureau van Dijk (BvD), an independent data provider that Moody's acquired in 2017 and folded into its analytics business. Since then, Orbis has continued the aggregation model BvD was built on: it licenses and blends company data from third-party providers rather than sourcing every record directly.
That inherited model delivers real breadth, but it also means the underlying data's freshness, format, and provenance depend on whatever the licensed vendor supplies — and reselling that data onward is governed by the terms Moody's itself inherited from BvD's original licensing agreements.
Global Database takes a different starting point: data is sourced directly, with the source, link, timestamp, and official filing published against each record. On top of that direct-sourced layer, Global Database adds a global ownership graph spanning 45M+ companies and 500M+ people, OCR-and-AI-digitized financials mapped consistently across countries, M&A and deal history, PEPs and sanctions screening, bank account verification, and people/contact data — with flexible reseller rights for enterprise clients who want to build on top of it.
"An aggregated dataset can only be as current as the vendor it was licensed from. A directly sourced record can always be traced back to the original filing."
For a one-off financial risk score in a market Moody's already covers well, its aggregated model is a reasonable fit. Where flexible resale rights, direct-to-source provenance, or a unified ownership graph across companies and people is the requirement, that's where Global Database is built to lead.
Key features compared
A closer look at what's included on each platform.
Global Database
Moody's
Reseller rights compared
Licensing terms vary by contract and use case — confirm specifics directly with either provider. The structural difference is below.
Moody’s, as an aggregator, licenses much of its underlying data from third-party vendors — which means what you can do with the data downstream is shaped by those inherited licensing terms, not a single, unified policy.
Global Database offers flexible reseller rights on enterprise plans: clients can integrate the data into their own product, resell it, or build derivative products directly on top of it, since the data is sourced and owned by Global Database's own pipeline rather than re-licensed from elsewhere.
See Global Database on your own company records
Request a data review and compare sourcing, ownership resolution, and reseller terms directly against what you're using today.