Company evidence a file can stand on.
Primary records from 400+ government registries across 200+ countries. Every field carries the registry it came from and the date it was pulled. Good enough for an intake file. Good enough for an exhibit.
One entity, followed from intake to closure.
Six checks, in the order a matter actually needs them. Each one hands its result to the next, and all six run on the same record.
Sourced directly from government registries
Source name and link on every dataset
Retrieval timestamp on every field
The original filing attached
12 years sourcing registry data
Disputes and litigation
Corporate and M&A
Restructuring and insolvency
Risk, compliance and client intake
Real estate and finance
Business development and pricing
Six places registry data does actual work in a firm.
Same underlying record, different question asked of it. Firms buy once and use it across practice groups rather than licensing a separate tool per team.
Trace the corporate tree from the bottom to the very top.
Sanctions and PEPs attach to the group and the people in it. Not to the name you screened.
A designation can sit on a parent two steps above your client, or on a director who never appears on the engagement letter. Screening the named party tests the one entity least likely to be flagged.
Screening and group resolution have to be the same operation.
- Sanctions
- OFSI, OFAC, EU and UN consolidated lists, plus national and regional regimes
- PEPs
- Domestic, foreign and international-organisation, with relatives, close associates and former officeholders
- What gets screened
- Every entity and every person in the resolved group
- What each hit shows
- The ownership path back to your client, with a match score
- How often
- Re-screened as designations change, not on a schedule
Perpetual monitoring. The file moves when the register moves.
Periodic review re-checks a client when someone remembers to. Perpetual monitoring watches every entity in the matter continuously, so a filing reaches the fee earner the day it lands.
Consequences shown are general orientation, not legal advice, and vary by jurisdiction and by the stage a matter has reached.
We built this because every alternative we looked at put a reseller between the register and the record. If you cannot point at the filing, you do not have evidence. You have someone's summary of it.
How to access the data.
Seven routes into the same primary, government-sourced dataset. Pick the one that fits your stack.
API
Query any company by registry identifier. Documented endpoints, JSON responses, provenance on every field.
Bulk data feeds
Full datasets and scheduled deltas, delivered to your warehouse on your cadence.
CRM
Enrich and verify accounts inside Salesforce, HubSpot and Microsoft Dynamics 365, against the same registry records.
Assistant connectors
Pull registry data straight into the assistant your teams already use.
Regis AI
Ask questions in natural language across the dataset and get answers with their sources attached.
Test it the way you would test a witness.
Company data is easy to demo and hard to trust. Rather than ask you to take coverage claims on faith, we would rather you tried to break them. Three ways to do that.
Bring entities you have already checked
Send a list you have run yourself, ideally one that gave you trouble. We return our record for each and show you every field where ours differs from yours, with the registry and filing date behind it. Differences are the point of the exercise.
Ask for coverage up front, not after
Depth varies by registry because it varies at source. We will tell you what is available in the jurisdictions you actually work in, field by field, including where a registry publishes little or nothing. A gap stated up front is worth more than a gap found in month three.
Trace one ownership chain end to end
Pick a group with holdings across several jurisdictions and follow the chain we return back to the filings it came from. If any step cannot be traced to a document, that is worth knowing before the record goes near a file.