Top 10 Markaaz Competitors & Alternatives for Global Business Verification (2026)

Why Businesses Are Searching for Markaaz Alternatives in 2025

As global compliance standards continue to tighten, companies across fintech, banking, payments, procurement, and enterprise SaaS are being pushed to verify business partners faster and with far greater accuracy. Platforms like Markaaz have emerged to address this challenge, offering business verification, data enrichment, and ongoing monitoring. But in 2025, many organizations are re-evaluating their options and actively comparing Markaaz against other providers—especially those that offer deeper registry coverage, more transparent data sourcing, broader global coverage, or more flexible API-first workflows.

The demand for real-time KYB (Know Your Business), accurate ownership and UBO data, and reliable financial intelligence has never been higher. Businesses are increasingly looking for verification partners who can go beyond basic business checks and deliver actionable insights sourced directly from official registries. At the same time, cost-efficiency, scalability, and the ability to integrate seamlessly into internal systems (CRM, onboarding flows, underwriting tools, risk engines) have become critical decision factors.

This has led to a surge in interest for platforms like Global Database, Zephira.ai, Moody’s Analytics (Orbis), Creditsafe, Middesk, OpenCorporates, and others—each offering unique strengths that appeal to different industries and use cases. Whether a company needs deeper ownership mapping, stronger U.S. business identity verification, real-time APIs, extensive corporate linkages, or broader international registry coverage, there are compelling alternatives worth considering.

In this guide, we break down the top 10 competitors to Markaaz for 2025. Each platform is reviewed based on:

• Data sourcing and global coverage

• Accuracy and depth of verification

• Ownership and UBO visibility

• API capabilities and integration options

• Financial and credit intelligence

• Ideal use cases and pricing considerations

If you’re evaluating business verification solutions—or searching for a platform that better matches your global KYB, onboarding, or compliance needs—this comparison will give you a clear, unbiased overview of the best alternatives available today.

What Is Markaaz?

Markaaz is a business verification and onboarding automation platform that helps companies validate small businesses, suppliers, and partners during digital onboarding. The platform focuses on confirming company identity, conducting KYB checks, and reducing friction in onboarding and compliance workflows.

Markaaz aggregates business data from multiple providers to create business profiles that include company existence checks, operational status, credit indicators, and risk signals. It is used by organizations that require fast verification and automated onboarding flows rather than deep registry-sourced intelligence, UBO mapping, or multi-layer corporate structures.

With increasing regulatory pressure and global KYB requirements, many companies compare Markaaz with alternatives that offer broader coverage, stronger data provenance, and more advanced corporate insights.

Core Features of Markaaz

Markaaz provides several features centered around business verification and onboarding efficiency:

• Business Existence & Registration Checks
  Validates whether a company is officially registered, legitimate, and active.

• KYB & Entity Validation
  Confirms basic business details and compliance-relevant identifiers.

• Credit Indicators & Risk Signals
  Delivers credit-related data points to support onboarding and risk assessment decisions.

• Fraud and Identity Risk Flags
  Identifies inconsistencies or anomalies that may indicate potential fraud.

• Onboarding Workflow Automation
  Streamlines forms, data entry, and verification steps to accelerate onboarding.

• API-Based Business Verification
  Allows companies to embed Markaaz checks directly into their internal or customer-facing workflows.

These features make Markaaz suitable for organizations that need rapid business verification with some credit insight, particularly in SME-heavy onboarding environments.

Who Uses Markaaz?

Markaaz is most commonly used by teams focused on fast, automation-driven onboarding:

• Fintech and Payment Providers
  To verify merchants, reduce manual reviews, and manage onboarding risk.

• Marketplaces and Platforms Working With Small Businesses
  To confirm legitimacy before enabling transactions or account creation.

• Procurement and Supplier Onboarding Teams
  To validate vendors and assess basic credit signals.

• SaaS Platforms Requiring Form Pre-Fill and Verification
  To reduce manual data entry and improve onboarding speed.

• Operations, Risk, and Compliance Teams
  To implement a lightweight KYB layer without building a full due-diligence infrastructure.

Why Teams Look for Markaaz Alternatives in 2026

Although Markaaz offers valuable verification and credit indicators, many organizations explore alternatives when they need deeper corporate intelligence, stronger source transparency, or broader global scale. The most common reasons include:

1. Need for Registry-Sourced, Verifiable Data

Many companies require official government-sourced data for compliance and auditability. Markaaz uses aggregated third-party sources, which may not provide full provenance.

2. Limited UBO and Group Structure Mapping

Organizations needing multi-layer ownership, corporate hierarchies, or UBO visibility often require platforms with deeper structural intelligence.

3. No Full Financial Statements or Registry Filings

While Markaaz offers credit indicators, it does not provide full financial statements, annual reports, or detailed registry filings.

4. Limited Global Depth for Enterprise-Level KYB

Large enterprises often require broader jurisdictional coverage and richer data layers, especially outside the U.S.

5. Need for More Flexible Data Licensing or Reseller Rights

Data platforms, analytics companies, and enterprise distributors may need licensing structures beyond what aggregated-data vendors typically offer.

6. Rising Compliance Requirements Across Supply Chain & AML Regulations

As global regulations tighten, companies need platforms with transparent sourcing, deeper accuracy, and more advanced data layers.

1. Global Database – Best Overall Registry-Sourced Alternative to Markaaz

Global Database is a leading provider of registry-sourced business information, offering 600 million company profiles across 200 countries and jurisdictions. The platform is designed for organizations that require dependable legal entity data, ownership transparency, financial intelligence, and large-scale corporate linkage mapping.

As a first-party data provider, Global Database sources information directly from official government registries. Each data attribute includes its original source reference, helping compliance, due-diligence, and risk teams maintain full auditability in regulated environments.

One of its major strengths is its coverage of 378 million corporate linkages, enabling users to understand complex parent-subsidiary relationships, cross-border structures, and group-level risk exposure. The platform also performs in-house financial statement digitization using OCR and AI, offering structured financials and historical insights that support more advanced risk and credit assessment workflows.

Global Database vs. Markaaz (2026 Comparison)

Strengths of Global Database

• 600M+ company profiles across 200 countries

  One of the largest global datasets of legally registered companies.

• First-party data provider

  All core data is sourced directly from official government registries, not aggregated from third parties.

• Attribute-level source transparency

  Every data field includes its original registry source — critical for auditability and compliance.

• 378M+ corporate linkages mapped

  Extensive group structure intelligence showing parent companies, subsidiaries, and cross-border relationships.

• Deep UBO mapping

  Multi-layer ownership from local filings, enabling identification of ultimate beneficial owners.

• Digitized financial statements (OCR + AI)

  Global Database processes financial filings in-house, offering structured financials and historical data.

  (Markaaz does not provide financial statements.)

• Flexible reseller and partner terms

  Suitable for distributors, onboarding platforms, and large data consumers.

• 80+ advanced search filters

  Including industry codes (SIC, NAICS, local codes), revenue, employees, and technology attributes.

Weaknesses of Global Database

• May offer more depth than needed for basic verification

  Organizations with simple KYB workflows may not need detailed ownership or financial data.

• Financial data availability varies by jurisdiction

  Some countries do not publish financial filings, limiting financial depth in those regions.

• Volume-based pricing may suit larger teams better

  Teams with very low verification needs may prefer simpler or fixed-price tools.

• Primarily focused on legal entity intelligence

  Platforms seeking lightweight or minimal-data verification may find Global Database more comprehensive than required.

Global Database vs. Markaaz — Comparison Table (2026)

Conclusion

Both Global Database and Markaaz serve the global business verification market, but they differ in depth, sourcing, and overall data philosophy.

Choose Global Database if you need:

• First-party registry data

• Attribute-level sourcing transparency

• Deep UBO mapping

• 378M+ corporate linkages

• Digitized financial statements

• A comprehensive legal + ownership + financial intelligence layer

• Flexible reseller or distributor licensing

Choose Markaaz if you need:

• A verification-focused platform

• Fast KYB workflows for onboarding

• Broad global business lookup with simpler data requirements

In short:

• Global Database is best for compliance, due diligence, financial risk, and global entity intelligence.

• Markaaz is well suited for streamlined verification and onboarding automation

FAQ: Global Database vs. Markaaz

1. Is Global Database a good alternative to Markaaz?

Yes. Global Database is a strong Markaaz alternative for organizations that need registry-sourced global data, financial statements, UBO mapping, and corporate linkages across 200 countries. It is particularly well suited for compliance, KYB, AML, and enterprise-scale data intelligence.

2. Does Global Database offer deeper data than Markaaz?

In key areas, yes. Global Database provides first-party registry data, attribute-level source transparency, financial statements, and 378M+ corporate linkages, which offer greater depth for risk, compliance, and due-diligence workflows.

3. Which platform is better for compliance and KYB: Global Database or Markaaz?

For advanced KYB, AML, ownership checks, and financial risk assessment, Global Database generally provides more depth. Markaaz is strong for verification and onboarding workflows, while Global Database is better suited for global due diligence and regulated industries.

4. Does Global Database provide financial statements?

Yes. Global Database offers structured financial statements digitized using OCR + AI, as well as credit scores and financial indicators where available from registries. Markaaz does not offer financial statements.

5. Does Global Database provide UBO mapping?

Yes. Global Database offers multi-layer UBO mapping, built directly from registry filings, across borders and multi-entity structures. Markaaz provides UBO visibility but with more limited depth.

6. Which platform has better global coverage?

Global Database covers 600M+ company profiles across 200 countries using registry data. Markaaz covers 500M+ companies across 200+ jurisdictions using aggregated sources. The difference lies in data sourcing philosophy rather than geographic reach.

7. Does Global Database offer corporate linkages?

Yes. Global Database maps 378M+ parent-subsidiary relationships, enabling detailed group-structure analysis. Markaaz provides corporate relationships, but the scope varies by region.

8. Which is better for enterprise data enrichment: Global Database or Markaaz?

Global Database is better suited for enterprise enrichment due to its advanced filters, registry sources, financials, corporate linkages, and flexible data delivery options (API + bulk). Markaaz is optimized mainly for verification use cases.

9. Does Global Database provide more transparent data sources than Markaaz?

Yes. Global Database includes attribute-level registry source references for every core data point. Markaaz does not provide source transparency at the same granular level.

10. Is Global Database more flexible for resellers than Markaaz?

Yes. Global Database offers partner-friendly and flexible reseller agreements, whereas Markaaz operates with more restrictive reseller rights.

2. Zephira.ai — Best Developer-First API Alternative to Markaaz for KYB, UBO & Global Registry Data

Zephira.ai is one of the strongest developer-focused alternatives to Markaaz, offering a clean, fast, and highly structured API for global KYB, UBO mapping, company verification, and registry-based entity intelligence. Built for engineers, onboarding platforms, regtechs, and financial institutions, Zephira.ai delivers real-time registry-sourced data, transparent field-level sourcing, and modular endpoints designed for integration into any compliance, onboarding, or risk workflow.

For companies searching phrases like “Markaaz competitors,” “Markaaz alternatives,” or “Zephira vs. Markaaz”, Zephira.ai stands out as a powerful option when data depth, speed, UBO visibility, and developer experience matter most.

Strengths of Zephira.ai

• Developer-first architecture

  API built from the ground up for engineers: predictable schema, fast queries, clean JSON responses.

• Registry-sourced global data

  All core data points originate from official government registries across 100+ countries.

• Full attribute-level sourcing

  Every field includes its original registry source — ideal for AML, audited workflows, and regulatory compliance.

• Modular endpoints for KYB & UBO

  Including: legal entity verification, shareholders, officers, UBO mapping, group structure, tax IDs, financials, and more.

• Real-time global coverage

  Live access to registry data for KYB and due diligence across Europe, APAC, the Americas, and emerging markets.

• Financial statements supported

  Financial filings are digitized using OCR + AI, enabling deeper credit and risk analysis.

• Easy integration into any workflow

  Perfect for onboarding flows, payment-risk engines, supplier verification, and marketplace trust layers.

Weaknesses of Zephira.ai

(Balanced and neutral for SEO credibility)

• No UI or dashboard

  Zephira is API-only and may not suit teams without engineering resources.

• Usage-based pricing

  Can scale with large request volumes, depending on workload.

• Financial data availability varies

  Only countries with public filings can return financials.

Zephira.ai vs. Markaaz Comparison Table

Conclusion — Zephira.ai as a Markaaz Alternative

Zephira.ai is a strong Markaaz alternative for organizations that need:

• Real-time registry-sourced company data

• Deep ownership, UBO, and shareholder intelligence

• Reliable KYB, AML, and due-diligence workflows

• A developer-focused API with fast integration

• Financial statements and structured filings

While Markaaz is well suited for UI-driven onboarding and verification, Zephira.ai excels in data depth, sourcing transparency, and developer-centric use cases. Companies building automated verification flows, financial compliance tools, or global risk engines often choose Zephira.ai for its precision, structure, and scalability.

FAQ: Zephira.ai vs. Markaaz

1. Is Zephira.ai a good alternative to Markaaz?

Yes. Zephira.ai is one of the strongest Markaaz alternatives for engineering teams needing registry-sourced KYB, UBO data, corporate linkages, and financial statements via API.

2. Does Zephira.ai offer better data depth than Markaaz?

Zephira.ai provides deeper registry data, field-level sourcing, UBO mapping, and structured financials — areas where Markaaz offers more limited coverage.

3. Which platform is better for developers: Zephira.ai or Markaaz?

Zephira.ai. Its developer-first architecture, clean JSON schemas, and consistent endpoints make it more suitable for product teams and engineers.

4. Does Zephira.ai provide financial statements?

Yes. Zephira.ai offers digitized financial filings via OCR + AI, whereas Markaaz does not provide financial statements.

5. Is Zephira.ai better for KYB automation?

For API-based KYB, UBO mapping, and registry-level verification, Zephira.ai provides broader depth and transparency. Markaaz remains strong for UI-based onboarding.

3. Dun & Bradstreet (DNB) — Established Global Data & Credit Intelligence Provider

Dun & Bradstreet (DNB) is one of the most recognized names in global business information, known for its vast dataset, long-standing industry presence, and proprietary credit scoring models. DNB is frequently compared to Markaaz—especially for enterprise use cases requiring corporate hierarchies, credit intelligence, financial statements, and global compliance datasets.

Its reputation and scale make DNB a strong option for large financial institutions, procurement teams, insurers, and multinational organizations that require mature, enterprise-grade business data solutions.

Strengths of Dun & Bradstreet

• Extensive global database

  Coverage across hundreds of millions of company records globally.

• Strong credit risk intelligence

  Industry-leading credit scoring, the D-U-N-S Number system, and predictive risk indicators.

• Mature corporate hierarchy data

  Well-developed parent/subsidiary linkages and group structures.

• Deep financial and compliance data

  Business filings, credit information, legal events, and financials where available.

• Enterprise-ready integrations

  Strong native connectivity with major ERPs, CRMs, and procurement platforms.

• Decades of trust in regulated industries

  Widely used by banks, insurers, and large enterprises requiring long-term data continuity.

Weaknesses of Dun & Bradstreet

• Strict reseller and redistribution rights

  DNB has one of the most restrictive licensing frameworks in the industry, making resale, redistribution, or bundling challenging for partners and platforms.

• Heavy reliance on data partners (with royalty obligations)

  In many countries, DNB depends on third-party sources rather than direct registry integrations. This can increase costs due to licensing fees and may affect data transparency.

• Limited attribute-level source visibility

  Unlike registry-first providers, DNB does not typically supply original source references at the field level.

• High pricing aligned with enterprise clients

  Often cost-prohibitive for SMBs, startups, or mid-market platforms.

• Complex contracts and onboarding

  Implementation and licensing can be more complex compared to newer API-first providers.

• Not developer-first

  The API is functional but not optimized for modern engineering workflows or rapid product embedding.

Dun & Bradstreet vs. Markaaz Comparison Table

Conclusion — DNB as a Markaaz Competitor

Dun & Bradstreet remains a strong Markaaz competitor for large enterprises needing high-quality credit intelligence, financial data, and global corporate hierarchies. Its established presence, risk models, and compliance datasets make it suitable for organizations that require deep, long-term business intelligence.

However, DNB’s strict reseller rights, dependence on external data partners (with associated royalties), and enterprise-level pricing make it less suitable for modern fintechs, regtechs, and growing digital platforms that need flexible licensing or developer-focused data access.

Markaaz remains a solid option for verification-first onboarding, while DNB serves organizations that require traditional, enterprise-grade credit and risk intelligence.

FAQ: Dun & Bradstreet vs. Markaaz

1. Is Dun & Bradstreet (DNB) a strong alternative to Markaaz?

Yes. Dun & Bradstreet is considered a strong Markaaz alternative for enterprises that need global credit intelligence, financial statements, and detailed corporate hierarchies. DNB is widely used by banks, insurers, and procurement teams looking for in-depth risk insights.

2. What is the main difference between Dun & Bradstreet and Markaaz?

DNB focuses on enterprise-grade credit data, financial reporting, and complex corporate structures, while Markaaz is optimized for business verification and onboarding workflows. DNB offers deeper risk modeling, whereas Markaaz offers fast verification tools.

3. Does Dun & Bradstreet provide UBO and ownership data?

Partially. DNB offers ownership and UBO information in select countries, but coverage depends on regional partners. Markaaz provides UBO visibility too, but with more limited depth.

4. Does Dun & Bradstreet rely on external data partners?

Yes. DNB relies heavily on external data partners in many countries—often with royalty obligations. This can affect cost, source transparency, and dataset consistency.

5. Are Dun & Bradstreet’s reseller rights restrictive?

Yes. Dun & Bradstreet is known for strict reseller and redistribution terms, making it harder for third-party platforms to resell or bundle DNB data compared to more flexible competitors.

4. Creditsafe — Global Business Credit & Risk Intelligence Provider

Creditsafe is a widely recognized business credit reporting and risk intelligence provider, best known for offering fast company checks, credit scores, and credit limits across many global markets. Compared to Markaaz, Creditsafe is often chosen by organizations looking for quick credit assessments, supplier checks, and basic KYB information.

Creditsafe has strong presence in Europe and North America, serving financial institutions, procurement teams, and SMBs that require accessible, easy-to-use business credit data.

Strengths of Creditsafe

• Strong global credit data coverage

  Creditsafe offers business credit reports across dozens of countries, with particular strength in Europe and the U.S.

• Fast access to credit risk indicators

  Including credit scores, credit limits, payment behavior, and financial distress signals.

• Simple, user-friendly interface

  Designed for quick company lookups and intuitive navigation, suitable for teams without technical expertise.

• API access for automated checks

  Creditsafe provides APIs for integrating credit reports into onboarding, risk, or underwriting workflows.

• Popular with SMBs and mid-market companies

  Because pricing is generally more accessible compared to enterprise-heavy providers like D&B.

• Useful for supplier and vendor checks

  Procurement teams often rely on Creditsafe for basic due-diligence and risk screening.

Weaknesses of Creditsafe

• Limited UBO and ownership depth

  Creditsafe does not specialize in ownership chains or multi-jurisdictional UBO mapping.

• No attribute-level sourcing from registries

  Creditsafe’s data sources are not always transparent at the field level.

• Financial data availability varies

  Financial statements and filings are only available in certain markets.

• Global coverage is uneven

  Strong in major markets, weaker in parts of APAC, Africa, and Latin America.

• Not designed for deep KYB or AML workflows

  Creditsafe is more suitable for credit checks than for regulated compliance processes.

• Reseller rights are limited

  Licensing and redistribution terms are stricter compared to flexible partner models.

Creditsafe vs. Markaaz Comparison Table

Conclusion — Creditsafe as a Markaaz Competitor

Creditsafe is a strong alternative to Markaaz for organizations focused on credit checks, supplier screening, and risk scoring, especially in Europe and North America. It offers reliable credit limits, payment data, and accessible pricing for SMBs and mid-market companies.

However, Creditsafe is less suited for deep KYB, ownership intelligence, or global registry-level verification, where more advanced platforms provide significantly broader coverage.

Markaaz excels in verification-first onboarding workflows, while Creditsafe excels in credit assessment and supplier risk analysis.

FAQ: Creditsafe vs. Markaaz

1. Is Creditsafe a good alternative to Markaaz?

Yes. Creditsafe is a strong Markaaz alternative for companies that specifically need business credit reports, credit scores, and supplier risk checks, especially in Europe and North America. It is well suited for procurement, underwriting, and SMB credit assessment.

2. What is the main difference between Creditsafe and Markaaz?

Creditsafe focuses on credit intelligence, payment performance, and risk scoring, while Markaaz is designed for business verification and onboarding. Creditsafe is better for credit checks, whereas Markaaz supports KYB and identity matching.

3. Does Creditsafe provide UBO or ownership data?

Only limited ownership visibility is available. Creditsafe does not specialize in deep UBO mapping or multi-layer ownership chains, while Markaaz also offers limited ownership depth. Platforms like Global Database offer far deeper ownership structures.

4. Does Creditsafe provide financial statements?

Yes, in select countries. Creditsafe offers financial statements where they are publicly available or sourced through partners. However, coverage varies by region, and financial data is not available in all markets. Markaaz does not provide financial statements.

5. Is Creditsafe suitable for global KYB and AML workflows?

Not typically. Creditsafe is primarily a credit risk provider, not a KYB or AML-focused platform. It is ideal for supplier checks and credit evaluations, while Markaaz is better suited for verification and onboarding workflows.

5. Moody’s Analytics (Orbis / Bureau van Dijk) — Deep Global Corporate Structures & Financial Intelligence

Moody’s Analytics (Bureau van Dijk – Orbis) is one of the world’s most comprehensive datasets for corporate ownership, global hierarchies, financial statements, and cross-border business intelligence. It is widely used by financial institutions, banks, researchers, and multinational corporations that require deep global insight into company structures and corporate families.

Compared to Markaaz, Orbis offers far deeper ownership data, broader financial coverage, and expansive corporate linkages, but generally comes with high pricing and restrictive licensing, making it less accessible for growing fintechs, SMBs, or developer-led organizations.

Strengths of Moody’s Analytics (Orbis)

• One of the largest global corporate structure databases

  Orbis provides unparalleled visibility into parent companies, subsidiaries, linkages, and cross-border families.

• Extensive UBO & ownership mapping

  Extremely deep ownership layers, including multi-step indirect ownership, ultimate beneficial owners, and integrated shareholder data.

• Strong financial coverage

  Detailed financial statements for millions of companies, historical data, ratios, and indicators.

• Trusted by major financial institutions

  Used by banks, governments, auditors, investment firms, and regulators for compliance and risk modeling.

• Advanced research tools

  Orbis is popular for macroeconomic analysis, competition analysis, and academic research due to dataset breadth.

• Powerful matching & standardization

  Uses advanced entity matching (including BvD ID Numbers) for consistent identification across jurisdictions.

Weaknesses of Moody’s Analytics (Orbis)

• Very high pricing

  Orbis is one of the most expensive platforms in the business intelligence industry, often prohibitive for SMBs and mid-market organizations.

• Strict reseller & redistribution rights

  Licensing is highly restrictive, limiting how platforms can use, display, or distribute Orbis data.

• Heavy reliance on external data suppliers

  Much of Orbis’ data is sourced from third-party partners, which also means royalty obligations, region-dependent availability, and variable source transparency.

• Complex platform

  Orbis is powerful but can be overwhelming, with a steep learning curve and complex workflows.

• Not developer-first

  API access exists but is designed for enterprise environments, not lightweight or modern developer workflows.

• Coverage inconsistencies by region

  Depth and availability of data vary across emerging markets.

Moody’s Analytics (Orbis) vs. Markaaz — Comparison Table

Conclusion — Moody’s Analytics (Orbis) as a Markaaz Competitor

Moody’s Analytics (Orbis) is one of the most advanced Markaaz competitors for organizations needing deep corporate linkages, multi-layer UBO mapping, and global financial intelligence. Its dataset is unmatched for corporate structure research, cross-border ownership tracing, and financial analysis.

However, Orbis is oriented toward large enterprises with the budget, technical resources, and licensing capacity to support its complex workflows and strict redistribution rules. For fast-growing fintechs, developer-led platforms, or SMBs, Orbis may be too costly and too restrictive.

Markaaz remains strong for verification and onboarding, while Orbis is designed for enterprise risk intelligence, corporate structure analysis, and regulatory compliance at scale.

FAQ: Moody’s Analytics (Orbis) vs. Markaaz

1. Is Moody’s Analytics (Orbis) a strong alternative to Markaaz?

Yes. Moody’s Analytics (Orbis) is one of the strongest Markaaz alternatives for organizations needing deep corporate ownership structures, UBO mapping, and global financial intelligence. It is widely used by banks, regulators, and multinational enterprises.

2. What is the main difference between Orbis and Markaaz?

Orbis provides extensive global ownership data, multi-layer UBO structures, and detailed financial statements, while Markaaz focuses on business verification and onboarding workflows. Orbis is stronger for complex corporate intelligence; Markaaz excels in verification-first use cases.

3. Does Moody’s Analytics rely on external data suppliers?

Yes. Orbis relies heavily on external regional data partners, which may require royalty payments and can impact source transparency and consistency. Markaaz also works with aggregated data sources.

4. Are reseller rights restrictive with Moody’s Analytics?

Very. Moody’s Analytics has some of the strictest licensing and redistribution rules in the industry. Third-party platforms usually cannot redistribute, display, or resell Orbis data freely.

5. Is Orbis suitable for KYB and AML workflows?

Yes, but primarily at the enterprise level. Orbis is ideal for institutions needing deep corporate linkage analysis and financial reporting, but may be too complex and expensive for SMBs or fast-scaling fintechs that need lightweight KYB automation.

6. Zavia.ai — Top Markaaz Alternative for UBO Mapping & Global Ownership Intelligence

Zavia.ai is a next-generation platform focused on uncovering corporate ownership structures, identifying UBOs, and mapping global group relationships. It combines official registry filings with AI-driven inference to reveal multi-layer ownership paths, making it highly valuable for compliance teams, AML investigators, and due-diligence professionals who require clarity on who ultimately controls an entity.

Unlike Markaaz, which is centered around fast business verification and onboarding automation, Zavia.ai goes significantly deeper into ownership intelligence, global corporate linkages, and cross-border entity networks.

Strengths of Zavia.ai

• AI-powered ownership discovery

  Utilizes machine learning and graph intelligence to detect indirect shareholders, hidden ownership routes, and layered control chains across multiple jurisdictions.

• Multi-layer UBO mapping

  Provides detailed views into ultimate beneficial owners, even when ownership is distributed through numerous legal entities.

• Advanced global corporate linkages

  Visualizes parent–subsidiary relationships, related entities, cross-border networks, and corporate group structures.

• Registry-first data model

  Registry filings form the foundation of Zavia.ai’s dataset, with AI inference used to extend ownership visibility where needed.

• Built for compliance and investigation workflows

  Well-suited for AML teams, due-diligence analysts, onboarding risk units, and investigative functions that require clarity beyond basic business verification.

Weaknesses of Zavia.ai

• Smaller total global company coverage than large-scale datasets.

• Limited availability of company financial statements.

• Some ownership layers rely on algorithmic inference where filings are incomplete.

• Better suited for analysts than developer-led integrations.

• Pricing typically fits mid-market and enterprise organizations.

Zavia.ai vs. Markaaz: Full Feature & Data Comparison

Conclusion — Zavia.ai as a Markaaz Competitor

Zavia.ai is a strong competitor to Markaaz for organizations that require deep ownership intelligence, global UBO mapping, and cross-border corporate linkage analysis. Its strengths lie in revealing complex ownership structures and providing clarity into who ultimately controls an entity — capabilities that go far beyond standard business verification.

While Markaaz excels at fast KYB checks and onboarding workflows, Zavia.ai is purpose-built for ownership discovery, risk analysis, and investigative due diligence, making it a powerful choice for compliance and AML-focused teams.

FAQs — Zavia.ai vs. Markaaz

1. Is Zavia.ai a strong alternative to Markaaz?

Yes. Zavia.ai offers far deeper ownership and UBO intelligence than Markaaz, making it ideal for compliance and investigative workflows.

2. Does Zavia.ai provide multi-layer UBO mapping?

Yes. Zavia.ai specializes in tracing multi-step UBO chains across multiple jurisdictions.

3. How does Zavia.ai compare to Markaaz in terms of data depth?

Zavia.ai provides stronger ownership visibility and corporate linkages, while Markaaz focuses primarily on verification and onboarding.

4. Does Zavia.ai offer company financial statements?

No. Zavia.ai is ownership-focused. Markaaz also does not provide financial reports.

5. Who typically uses Zavia.ai?

AML investigators, compliance teams, due-diligence analysts, and any organization requiring global UBO clarity.

7. Middesk — Leading U.S. Business Verification Platform for KYB & Onboarding

Middesk is a well-known U.S.-focused KYB and business verification platform used by fintechs, lenders, banking-as-a-service (BaaS) providers, and compliance teams. It specializes in helping companies instantly validate U.S. businesses, retrieve government filings, and automate onboarding workflows via API.

Compared to Markaaz, Middesk offers more authoritative U.S. business data, stronger compliance workflows, and more advanced KYB automation. However, its coverage is almost entirely limited to the United States, making it less suited for teams with international verification needs.

Strengths of Middesk

• Strong U.S. business data coverage

  Connects directly with U.S. federal and state-level registries, offering highly accurate domestic KYB data.

• KYB automation tools

  Offers automated checks for EIN verification, Secretary of State filings, registration status, entity type, and business history.

• Excellent API-first infrastructure

  Designed for developers and BaaS providers that need to integrate KYB checks into onboarding flows at scale.

• Compliance-ready workflows

  Supports risk reviews, onboarding decisions, and integration into fraud or compliance engines.

• Trusted by major U.S. fintechs

  A preferred choice for organizations operating in U.S.-specific financial services.

Weaknesses of Middesk

• U.S.-only company coverage

  No international KYB, UBO, or global entity intelligence.

• No global ownership or multi-layer UBO mapping

  Corporate structures are limited to domestic filings.

• Limited financial data

  Does not provide detailed financial statements or ratios.

• Not suitable for companies with global supply chains or international partners

  Coverage stops at U.S. borders.

• Primarily API-driven

  Less suitable for non-technical teams requiring UI-based workflows.

Middesk vs. Markaaz: Full Feature & Data Comparison

Conclusion — Middesk as a Markaaz Competitor

Middesk is a strong Markaaz competitor within the U.S. business verification and KYB automation space. It offers excellent domestic data accuracy, strong compliance tools, and a developer-friendly API that fits the needs of modern fintechs and financial platforms.

However, Middesk is limited to the U.S. market. Organizations with global KYB needs, international customers, cross-border suppliers, or worldwide onboarding will find Middesk unsuitable without additional data providers. In contrast, Markaaz covers international jurisdictions but offers shallower ownership and financial insights.

For teams focused exclusively on U.S. onboarding and verification, Middesk stands out as a top choice.

FAQs — Middesk vs. Markaaz

1. Is Middesk a good alternative to Markaaz for business verification?

Yes. Middesk is a strong Markaaz alternative for U.S.-only business verification. It offers highly accurate KYB checks using direct federal and state registry data. However, Markaaz is better for companies needing global business verification across 200+ jurisdictions.

2. Does Middesk offer global KYB or international company verification?

No. Middesk’s coverage is limited to the United States. It does not provide international business verification or global KYB checks. If you require global coverage, Markaaz offers significantly broader international reach.

3. Does Middesk provide UBO mapping or corporate ownership structures?

No. Middesk does not offer UBO mapping, ownership layers, or corporate hierarchy data. Middesk focuses on U.S. company verification. Markaaz also offers limited ownership capabilities compared to specialized ownership intelligence platforms.

4. Which platform is better for fintech onboarding and KYB automation?

For U.S.-only fintechs, Middesk is a top choice due to its precise domestic data and developer-first API.

For international fintechs or platforms onboarding companies across borders, Markaaz is more suitable because of its global entity coverage.

5. What is the key difference between Middesk and Markaaz?

The main difference is geographic scope:

• Middesk specializes in U.S. registry-based KYB.

• Markaaz offers broader global business verification.

  Companies operating internationally typically choose Markaaz, while U.S.-focused fintechs often choose Middesk.

8. OpenCorporates — The World’s Largest Open Company Registry Database

OpenCorporates is one of the most widely recognized open-data platforms for global company information. Its mission is transparency: making company registries around the world freely accessible to the public. With data sourced from official government registries, OpenCorporates provides basic company records, officer information, and filing data from over 140 jurisdictions.

Compared to Markaaz, OpenCorporates offers broader global registry transparency, while Markaaz delivers a verification-first platform focused on onboarding automation. OpenCorporates is ideal for researchers, journalists, NGOs, and light due-diligence workflows — but not designed for real-time KYB, UBO mapping, or financial intelligence.

Strengths of OpenCorporates

• Largest open database of company information

  Tens of millions of companies from 140+ jurisdictions, sourced directly from government registries.

• Strong transparency mission

  Ideal for investigative journalism, compliance research, and corporate accountability initiatives.

• Officer and director data available

  Includes officer names, filings, and appointments when provided by local registries.

• Free and paid access options

  Data is partially free, with enterprise licensing available for bulk or API access.

• Excellent for registry validation and cross-checking

  Useful for confirming whether a company exists and identifying core registry attributes.

Weaknesses of OpenCorporates

• No UBO mapping or ownership layers

  Does not trace control structures or shareholder relationships.

• Limited corporate linkages

  No global group structures or parent–subsidiary mapping.

• No company financial statements

  Financial data is not provided, even in paid plans.

• Coverage varies by jurisdiction

  Some registries provide detailed data; others offer only minimal fields.

• Not built for onboarding automation or real-time KYB

  Lacks the enriched datasets and workflows needed for fintechs and enterprise compliance teams.

OpenCorporates vs. Markaaz: Full Feature & Data Comparison

Conclusion — OpenCorporates as a Markaaz Competitor

OpenCorporates is a strong competitor to Markaaz for organizations that prioritize registry transparency, public records access, and verification through official filings. It is particularly valuable for investigative work, academic research, and light compliance checks.

However, OpenCorporates is not designed for onboarding, KYB automation, ownership mapping, financial intelligence, or risk-based workflows. For teams needing real-time verification, enriched global datasets, or integrated onboarding flows, Markaaz remains the more suitable solution.

FAQs — OpenCorporates vs. Markaaz

1. Is OpenCorporates a strong alternative to Markaaz for global company information?

OpenCorporates is a strong alternative if you need raw registry data, public filings, and official company records from more than 140 global registries.

If your goal is automated KYB checks, onboarding workflows, or verification across 200+ jurisdictions, Markaaz is better suited.

2. Does OpenCorporates provide UBO information or ownership structures?

No. OpenCorporates does not provide UBO mapping, shareholder hierarchies, or ownership chains. Its data is limited to what registries publish publicly.

Markaaz also offers limited ownership details, but neither platform specializes in UBO intelligence.

3. What is the main difference between OpenCorporates and Markaaz?

OpenCorporates focuses on open-access registry transparency, making official filings and basic company records easily searchable.

Markaaz focuses on business verification, identity checks, and onboarding automation, offering broader global coverage and enrichment suited for compliance workflows.

4. Does OpenCorporates include company financial statements or credit data?

No. OpenCorporates does not offer financial statements, credit risk indicators, or financial analytics.

Markaaz also does not provide financial statements but supports broader verification-focused datasets for KYB workflows.

5. Who typically uses OpenCorporates?

OpenCorporates is widely used by:

• Investigative journalists

• NGOs and transparency organizations

• Researchers

• Compliance analysts needing registry confirmation

• Public sector & academic groups

Teams requiring real-time KYB, global onboarding automation, or verification across 200+ markets typically use a platform like Markaaz instead.

9. Monetaiq — Global Financial Data Platform for Private & Public Companies

Monetaiq is a financial data intelligence platform providing real-time access to 400M+ private companies and 60,000 public companies across more than 100 countries. The platform specializes in delivering financial statements, historical performance data, company profiles, and ticker-level insights—making it a powerful resource for analysts, financial institutions, investment teams, and risk assessment workflows.

Compared to Markaaz, which focuses on business verification and onboarding automation, Monetaiq stands out for its financial data depth, historical records, and coverage of both private and public companies.

Strengths of Monetaiq

• Extensive global financial data

  Includes balance sheets, income statements, cash flow statements, financial ratios, and performance metrics for millions of companies.

• Deep private company coverage

  Financials and profiles for 400M+ private companies, which is significantly broader than most verification platforms.

• Public company market data

  Access to 60,000+ public companies, with up-to-date ticker information and historical performance.

• Historical data availability

  Supports multi-year analysis, trend identification, and financial modeling.

• API and bulk delivery

  Offers developer-friendly APIs and bulk data feeds for large-scale integration into platforms, CRMs, or financial tools.

• Ideal for risk, underwriting, and investment workflows

  Provides the depth needed for credit assessment, valuation, portfolio research, and due diligence.

Weaknesses of Monetaiq

• Does not provide KYB verification or onboarding automation like Markaaz.

• Limited ownership, UBO, or group structure visibility.

• No company credit scores (unless calculated externally).

• Less optimized for compliance teams compared to fintech-focused verification platforms.

• Primarily data-focused; no low-code onboarding flows.

Monetaiq vs. Markaaz: Full Feature & Data Comparison

Conclusion — Monetaiq as a Markaaz Competitor

Monetaiq is a strong competitor to Markaaz for organizations that need deep financial intelligence, multi-year company performance data, and broad coverage of both private and public companies. It excels in underwriting, financial modeling, investment research, and credit analysis.

While Markaaz focuses on identity resolution and onboarding automation, Monetaiq delivers structured financial statements and historical data on a global scale—making it a better fit for finance, banking, and analytics teams rather than KYB workflows.

Top 5 FAQs — Monetaiq vs. Markaaz

1. Is Monetaiq a strong alternative to Markaaz for global company data?

Yes. Monetaiq is a strong alternative for companies that require global financial statements, private company financials, and historical performance data, while Markaaz is better for KYB and onboarding automation.

2. Does Monetaiq provide financial statements for private companies?

Yes. Monetaiq offers financial data for 400M+ private companies, including income statements, balance sheets, cash flow data, and ratios—far deeper than typical verification platforms.

3. What is the biggest difference between Monetaiq and Markaaz?

Monetaiq focuses on financial intelligence and historical company data, whereas Markaaz focuses on business verification and onboarding automation.

4. Does Monetaiq include public company market and ticker data?

Yes. Monetaiq offers data for 60,000+ public companies, including ticker-level information and historical performance.

5. Who should choose Monetaiq over Markaaz?

Teams in investment research, credit risk, underwriting, portfolio management, and financial analytics will gain more from Monetaiq’s in-depth financial dataset than from Markaaz’s verification-driven approach.

10. Experian — Global Credit, Risk, and Business Information Provider

Experian is one of the world’s largest credit and business information providers, offering data on millions of companies across more than 200 countries. It is widely used by banks, financial institutions, lenders, insurers, and enterprises that require business credit scores, financial risk indicators, fraud prevention tools, and identity verification solutions.

Compared to Markaaz—which primarily focuses on business verification and onboarding automation—Experian delivers far deeper credit intelligence, risk scoring, and financial health insights, making it a strong competitor for organizations that need more than simple KYB checks.

Strengths of Experian

• Global business credit data

  Provides credit scores, credit limits, financial stability indicators, payment behavior, and risk grades for millions of companies.

• Extensive financial and risk intelligence

  Offers financial statements, payment histories, delinquency data, fraud risk factors, and industry-specific risk models.

• Advanced identity and fraud solutions

  Includes identity checks, fraud scoring, and compliance tools used by banks and regulated institutions.

• Strong reputation and global reach

  Decades of credibility in credit and risk analytics across 200+ countries and territories.

• API, dashboards, and enterprise integrations

  Supports automated decisioning, portfolio monitoring, credit assessments, and underwriting workflows.

• Used by credit teams, underwriters, and financial institutions

  Tailored for organizations requiring continuous risk monitoring and financial profiling.

Weaknesses of Experian

• Higher pricing than lightweight verification platforms.

• No open access data — all datasets are paid and license-controlled.

• Limited transparency on raw registry sources compared to open-data models.

• Not optimized for lightweight onboarding flows; built more for credit assessment.

• Data refresh cycles vary significantly by country and dataset.

Experian vs. Markaaz: Full Feature & Data Comparison

Conclusion — Experian as a Markaaz Competitor

Experian stands out as one of the most powerful competitors to Markaaz for companies requiring credit data, financial statements, risk scoring, and global financial intelligence. It is designed for regulated industries and financial institutions that need deep insight into a company’s financial stability and creditworthiness.

While Markaaz focuses on KYB verification and onboarding automation, Experian provides credit-grade financial analysis, fraud controls, and risk evaluation, making it the preferred choice for lending, underwriting, risk assessment, and identity decisioning.

Top 5 FAQs — Experian vs. Markaaz

1. Is Experian a strong alternative to Markaaz for business verification?

Yes. Experian is a strong competitor for companies needing business credit data, financial risk scoring, and creditworthiness insights, while Markaaz focuses more on basic verification and onboarding workflows.

2. Does Experian provide company credit reports and financial statements?

Yes. Experian offers detailed credit reports, financial statements, payment history, and credit risk indicators, which Markaaz does not provide.

3. What is the biggest difference between Experian and Markaaz?

Experian specializes in credit, risk, and financial intelligence, while Markaaz specializes in KYB verification and onboarding automation. Their use cases differ significantly.

4. Does Experian offer fraud prevention and identity verification tools?

Yes. Experian provides advanced fraud scoring, identity checks, and compliance tools widely used in banking and regulated industries.

5. Who should choose Experian instead of Markaaz?

Banks, lenders, insurers, financial institutions, and risk teams needing credit scoring, underwriting data, and fraud controls will benefit more from Experian’s capabilities than from Markaaz's verification-first approach.

Conclusion: The Future of Business Verification & KYB in 2025

The KYB sector in 2025 is defined by a shift from broad, aggregated datasets toward high-integrity, registry-based intelligence. As organizations operate across more jurisdictions and face stricter compliance requirements, the market is clearly favoring platforms capable of delivering verifiable data, ownership transparency, and automated decisioning.

Registry-First Data Is Becoming a Competitive Requirement

The competitive gap between providers using official registry filings and those relying on third-party aggregators is widening.

Registry-first datasets offer:

• higher match accuracy

• clear auditability

• stronger compliance alignment

• reduced fraud exposure

This shift is driven not by preference, but by necessity: KYB decisions increasingly require traceable data provenance, especially in regulated industries.

Automation Is Now a Differentiating Factor

Enterprises are optimizing onboarding and supplier review workflows to reduce operational cost.

As a result, platforms with:

• high automation rates

• strong API orchestration

• real-time updates

• standardized entity resolution

are becoming more competitive than those limited to front-end verification tools.

Automation is no longer a “feature”—it is a determining factor in vendor selection.

The Market Is Splitting Into Two Tiers

A clear segmentation is emerging:

Tier 1: Registry-first, data-rich intelligence platforms

These platforms provide UBO mapping, corporate linkages, financial intelligence, and global coverage. They serve banks, fintechs, and enterprises with high compliance needs.

Tier 2: Workflow-first verification tools

These solutions focus on onboarding flows, form validation, and fraud prevention but offer limited depth in ownership or financial data.

This division will continue to shape how companies choose between Markaaz and its competitors.

Final Assessment

The future of KYB belongs to platforms that can combine:

• trusted registry data

• multi-layer ownership insights

• global scale

• financial and risk intelligence

• end-to-end automation

Organizations evaluating Markaaz alternatives should prioritize solutions that meet these technical and regulatory demands.

As compliance expectations increase, data depth and transparency—not interface design—will determine long-term market leadership.

Top Questions About Markaaz & KYB Alternatives

1. What is Markaaz used for in business verification?

Markaaz is a business verification and onboarding platform designed to help companies validate suppliers, small businesses, and partners. It focuses on company existence checks, identity validation, and risk signals to streamline onboarding workflows.

2. What are the best alternatives to Markaaz for global business verification?

Top Markaaz alternatives include Global Database, Zephira.ai, Dun & Bradstreet, Creditsafe, Moody’s (Orbis), Zavia.ai, Middesk, OpenCorporates, Monetaiq, and Experian. These platforms offer varying strengths in registry data, UBO mapping, financial intelligence, and global coverage.

3. Does Markaaz provide UBO (Ultimate Beneficial Ownership) data?

Markaaz provides limited ownership information but does not offer deep multi-layer UBO mapping. Platforms like Global Database, Zephira.ai, Zavia.ai, and Dun & Bradstreet provide more advanced UBO and corporate group structure insights.

4. Which KYB platforms offer the most accurate registry-sourced data?

Platforms such as Global Database, Zephira.ai, Dun & Bradstreet, Moody’s (Orbis), and Zavia.ai maintain direct connections to global business registries, offering more authoritative and transparent data than aggregator-based solutions.

5. What is the difference between registry-first data and aggregated company data?

Registry-first data comes directly from official government sources and provides legally verified identifiers, ownership, filings, and financial information. Aggregated data is compiled from multiple third parties and may lack transparency, consistency, or auditability.

6. Which Markaaz competitor offers the best global coverage?

Global Database provides 600M+ company profiles across 200 countries, making it one of the largest registry-sourced datasets globally. Dun & Bradstreet, Experian, and Moody’s Orbis also offer extensive international coverage but often rely on multiple data partners.

7. Which platform is best for verifying suppliers and international partners?

Global Database, Zephira.ai, and Zavia.ai are strong for supplier risk verification because they offer registry filings, group structures, UBOs, financials, and risk indicators—ideal for procurement and vendor onboarding teams.

8. Which KYB solution is most suitable for onboarding automation?

Markaaz, Middesk, and Zephira.ai are commonly used for automated KYB workflows due to their API-first design. For deeper ownership or risk analysis, companies often combine onboarding automation tools with registry-first intelligence platforms.

9. Do any Markaaz competitors provide financial statements and credit data?

Yes. Global Database digitizes financial statements using OCR + AI and offers credit indicators. Creditsafe, Dun & Bradstreet, Experian, and Moody’s (Orbis) also provide financial data at scale.

10. What’s the best Markaaz alternative for banks and fintechs?

Banks and fintechs typically prefer registry-sourced platforms with ownership and financial transparency. Global Database, Zephira.ai, Moody’s (Orbis), and Dun & Bradstreet are the most common choices for regulated industries.